[community] thoughts on current rationing policies

[modesnoyers at gmail.com]

Hi Jutta, I think your critique is clear. I was hesitant about the use of those three words within the message. Why am I? Because those three words are used to divide and create the idea of "other". I didn't want that to detract from your message!

-----Original Message-----
From: Jutta Treviranus <jtreviranus at ocadu.ca> 
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 15:30
To: modesnoyers at gmail.com
Cc: Anne Jackson <anne at annejackson.ca>; Inclusive Design Community <community at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca>
Subject: Re: [community] thoughts on current rationing policies

Thanks Monique, I am critiquing exactly that, and trying to make the point that we sink or swim together, but maybe the critique isn’t sufficiently clear. 

Jutta

> On Mar 28, 2020, at 3:21 PM, modesnoyers at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Hi Jutta,
> 
> Thanks for this article and speaking clearly to the appropriation of concepts to justify destructive behavior based on false information.
> 
> I was however uncomfortable with the following language: "… but survival of our race, nation or society." The questionable concepts of race and nation, and even society, are often used to validate destruction in the name of some greater cause. Think of the assumptions at the core of colonialism. I’m concerned readers of the article could use those to perpetuate the “othering” that is essentially part of the problem to start with. 
> 
> Best regards
> Monique Desnoyers
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: community <community-bounces at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca> On Behalf Of 
> Anne Jackson
> Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2020 14:52
> To: Jutta Treviranus <jtreviranus at ocadu.ca>
> Cc: Inclusive Design Community <community at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca>
> Subject: Re: [community] thoughts on current rationing policies
> 
> Wow. That was an excellent read and of course pertinent to my doctoral these. I was struggling with the Darwin connection but it was beautifully explained. 
> 
> Also pivotal was this  in my thought was “ Caring about people who are vulnerable compels us to create the conditions for surviving when we are vulnerable. This compunction gives us a larger safety net, especially in times of unexpected and disruptive hardship. The reasons we are unprepared for this crisis are because we devalued, marginalized and stopped caring for our vulnerable”
> 
> I am reminded of when nazi Germany gassed the disabled first as they 
> were seen as expendable and a drain on society
> 
> Thanks Jutta
> 
> Anne Jackson. 
> Ph.D Candidate YorkU. 
> 
> Warning:
> May contain strange autocorrect typographical anomalies.
> 
>> On Mar 28, 2020, at 2:01 PM, Jutta Treviranus <jtreviranus at ocadu.ca> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> I wrote a piece on some of the current misconceptions of who is weak. I would love your reactions.
>> 
>> https://medium.com/@jutta.trevira/its-time-to-drop-darwinism-and-list
>> e 
>> n-to-darwin-and-his-successors-on-human-evolution-19239068e8dc?sk=4e6
>> c
>> aa8e9dbf05bbf493eb7c1511de3b
>> 
>> Jutta
>> ________________________________________
>> Inclusive Design Community (community at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca) To manage 
>> your subscription, please visit:
>> https://lists.idrc.ocadu.ca/mailman/listinfo/community
> ________________________________________
> Inclusive Design Community (community at lists.idrc.ocadu.ca) To manage 
> your subscription, please visit: 
> https://lists.idrc.ocadu.ca/mailman/listinfo/community
>